> Am 17.07.2022 um 17:29 schrieb lkcl via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>: > > with the recent announcement that rust is supported by gcc > has it been taken into consideration that the draconian (non-free-compatible) > requirements of the rust Trademark make the distribution of the gcc > compiler Unlawful? > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1013920 > > if the word "rust" is entirely removed from the gcc source code then > there is no problem whatsoever (recall: "iceweasel"). We’ll call it gust. Richard > > l.
- rust non-free-compatible trademark lkcl via Gcc
- Re: rust non-free-compatible trademark Richard Biener via Gcc
- Re: rust non-free-compatible trademark lkcl via Gcc
- Re: rust non-free-compatible trademar... Richard Kenner via Gcc
- Re: rust non-free-compatible trademark Alexandre Oliva via Gcc
- Re: rust non-free-compatible trademark Mark Wielaard
- Re: rust non-free-compatible trademark lkcl via Gcc
- Re: rust non-free-compatible trademar... Mark Wielaard
- Re: rust non-free-compatible trad... lkcl via Gcc
- Re: rust non-free-compatible... lkcl via Gcc
- Re: rust non-free-compat... Mark Wielaard
- Re: rust non-free-co... lkcl via Gcc