On Thu, 17 Jun 2021, Richard Earnshaw via Gcc wrote: > It seems a bit dangerous to me to rely on just extracting PR numbers from > tests. What if the patch is just adjusting a test to make it compatible with > the remainder of the change?
Also, that a test is added for a PR, or a commit is relevant to a PR, is a weaker property than the commit *resolving* the PR. The fact that a commit *resolves* a PR (allows it to be marked as resolved, or the regression markers to be updated if it's resolved in master but the fix still needs to be backported) needs to be explicitly affirmed by the committer (possibly based on a question asked by a script) rather than assumed by default based on the PR being mentioned somewhere. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
