You don't have to believe me of course.  Go ask any lawyer worth her
salt and she'll tell you the same thing!


> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2021 at 7:53 PM
> From: "Aaron Gyes" <aaron...@icloud.com>
> To: "Christopher Dimech" <dim...@gmx.com>
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: A suggestion for going forward from the RMS/FSF debate
>
> If the purpose was to facilitate lawsuits, and these lawsuits haven’t 
> occurred after all these years, it seems like it didn’t work. Maybe you are 
> wrong about the intent?
> 
> Aaron
> 
> > On Apr 18, 2021, at 12:50 AM, Christopher Dimech <dim...@gmx.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > I know that Apple can make some strong ownership claims.  Also Red Hat,
> > but I consider it minimal.  Apple has a very long history of aggressive
> > legal actions. 
> > 
> >> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2021 at 7:24 PM
> >> From: "Aaron Gyes" <aaron...@icloud.com>
> >> To: "Christopher Dimech" <dim...@gmx.com>
> >> Subject: Re: A suggestion for going forward from the RMS/FSF debate
> >> 
> >> Can you tell me about some of the lawsuits that resulted?
> >> 
> >> –
> >> Aaron
> >> 
> >>> On Apr 18, 2021, at 12:08 AM, Christopher Dimech <dim...@gmx.com> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2021 at 5:46 PM
> >>>> From: "Aaron Gyes" <aaron...@icloud.com>
> >>>> To: "Christopher Dimech" <dim...@gmx.com>
> >>>> Subject: Re: A suggestion for going forward from the RMS/FSF debate
> >>>> 
> >>>>> Furthermore, it continues to nullify the Apache License by allowing 
> >>>>> patent
> >>>>> treachery.  The LLVM License is thus a perfidious license intended to
> >>>>> allow the licensor to sue you at their choosing.=
> >>>> 
> >>>> “Patent treachery”? And the intent of the license is to... accommodate 
> >>>> lawsuits?
> >>> 
> >>> Correct.   The Apache License included certain patent termination and 
> >>> counterclaim provisions, made void and null by the LLVM Exceptions.  
> >>> Originally, the LLVM License
> >>> was based on the two free software licenses - the X11 license and the 
> >>> 3-clause BSD license.  By 2005, Apple managed to hamstring the project by 
> >>> hiring Chris Lattner
> >>> and giving him a team to work on LLVM.
> >>> 
> >>>> That’s some very motivated reasoning you’re doing right there.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Aaron
> >> 
> 
>

Reply via email to