On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 09:18, Iain Sandoe wrote: > > Perhaps the PR should be reopened with “accepts invalid”?
My impression from the PR is that the reporter was using a different ABI, where the name isn't reserved. Maybe the testcase should only be accepted with -fno-threadsafe-statics or -ffreestanding or something to say "I'm doing things differently". Or we could just say that G++ reserves the Itanium ABI names unconditionally, even if it doesn't need to use them, in which case it would be accepts-invalid.
