On July 25, 2020 10:47:59 PM GMT+02:00, Gary Oblock <g...@amperecomputing.com> 
wrote:
>Richard,
>
>I suppose that might be doable but aren't there any ramifications
>from the fact that the problematic ssa_names are the default defs?
>I can imagine easily replacing all the ssa names except those that
>are default defs.

Well, just changing the SSA names doesn't make it less ramifications. You have 
to know what you are doing. 

So - what's the reason you need to change those SSA name types? 

Richard. 

>Gary
>________________________________
>From: Richard Biener <richard.guent...@gmail.com>
>Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 11:16 PM
>To: Gary Oblock <g...@amperecomputing.com>; Gary Oblock via Gcc
><gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; gcc@gcc.gnu.org <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
>Subject: Re: Problems with changing the type of an ssa name
>
>[EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from an external sender.
>Please be mindful of safe email handling and proprietary information
>protection practices.]
>
>
>On July 25, 2020 7:30:48 AM GMT+02:00, Gary Oblock via Gcc
><gcc@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>>If you've followed what I've been up to via my questions
>>on the mailing list, I finally traced my latest big problem
>>back to to my own code. In a nut shell here is what
>>I'm doing.
>>
>>I'm creating a new type exaactly like this:
>>
>>    tree pointer_rep =
>>      make_signed_type ( TYPE_PRECISION ( pointer_sized_int_node));
>>    TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT ( pointer_rep) =
>>      TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT ( pointer_sized_int_node);
>>    const char *gcc_name =
>>identifier_to_locale ( IDENTIFIER_POINTER ( TYPE_NAME (
>>ri->gcc_type)));
>>    size_t len =
>>      strlen ( REORG_SP_PTR_PREFIX) + strlen ( gcc_name);
>>    char *name = ( char *)alloca(len + 1);
>>    strcpy ( name, REORG_SP_PTR_PREFIX);
>>    strcat ( name, gcc_name);
>>    TYPE_NAME ( pointer_rep) = get_identifier ( name);
>>
>>I detect an ssa_name that I want to change to have this type
>>and change it thusly. Note, this particular ssa_name is a
>>default def which I seems to be very pertinent (since it's
>>the only case that fails.)
>>
>>    modify_ssa_name_type ( an_ssa_name, pointer_rep);
>>
>>void
>>modify_ssa_name_type ( tree ssa_name, tree type)
>>{
>>  // This rips off the code in make_ssa_name_fn with a
>>  // modification or two.
>>
>>  if ( TYPE_P ( type) )
>>    {
>>       TREE_TYPE ( ssa_name) = TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT ( type);
>>       if ( ssa_defined_default_def_p ( ssa_name) )
>>          {
>>             // I guessing which I know is a terrible thing to do...
>> SET_SSA_NAME_VAR_OR_IDENTIFIER ( ssa_name, TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (
>type));
>>           }
>>         else
>>           {
>>           // The following breaks defaults defs hence the check
>above.
>>             SET_SSA_NAME_VAR_OR_IDENTIFIER ( ssa_name, NULL_TREE);
>>           }
>>        }
>>     else
>>        {
>>          TREE_TYPE ( ssa_name) = TREE_TYPE ( type);
>>          SET_SSA_NAME_VAR_OR_IDENTIFIER ( ssa_name, type);
>>        }
>>}
>>
>>After this it dies when trying to call print_generic_expr with the ssa
>>name.
>>
>>Here's the bottom most complaint from the internal error:
>>
>>tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have
>>‘integer_type’ in dump_generic_node, at tree-pretty-print.c:3154
>>
>>Can anybody tell what I'm doing wrong?
>
>Do not modify existing SSA names, instead create a new one and replace
>uses of the old.
>
>Richard.
>
>>Thank,
>>
>>Gary
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any
>attachments,
>>is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and contains
>>information that is confidential and proprietary to Ampere Computing
>or
>>its subsidiaries. It is to be used solely for the purpose of
>furthering
>>the parties' business relationship. Any review, copying, or
>>distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) is strictly
>>prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
>>sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copies
>>of this email and any attachments thereto.

Reply via email to