On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 20:29, Bernd Edlinger wrote: > > -On 3/25/20 7:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote: > >> I believe the canonical place for the "Linux suff" mailing lists these > >> days is > >> lore.kernel.org, powered by public-inbox[1]. ISTM that software can > >> address most > >> if not all needs of those involved in GCC development and even has NNTP > >> support, > >> though I've no idea whether it could be an acceptable solution from the > >> overseers' perspective. > >> > >> [1] https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git > > > > The overseers are trying hard to use only software that can be installed > > via the RHEL packaging system so as not to duplicate the mistake that > > kept us dependent on poorly supported mail software. Is there a > > public-inbox rpm package for RHEL or CentOS? > > > > FWIW, this particular overseer is is also pretty exhausted from the > > effort of moving sourceware to a new system + new software and would not > > relish the effort involved in getting all of this moved to new software. > > > > Honestly this is not about blaming you at all. > > I do not quite understand what is the exact software which > was used previously?
See the link at the bottom of every page in the old archive: http://www.mhonarc.org/ > what is the exact problem that prevents it from being used any longer? It's not packaged for RHEL 8. > Which software is being used now? See the text at the bottom of every page in the new archive: Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition).
