-On 3/25/20 7:55 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:23:02PM +0700, Arseny Solokha wrote: >> I believe the canonical place for the "Linux suff" mailing lists these days >> is >> lore.kernel.org, powered by public-inbox[1]. ISTM that software can address >> most >> if not all needs of those involved in GCC development and even has NNTP >> support, >> though I've no idea whether it could be an acceptable solution from the >> overseers' perspective. >> >> [1] https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git > > The overseers are trying hard to use only software that can be installed > via the RHEL packaging system so as not to duplicate the mistake that > kept us dependent on poorly supported mail software. Is there a > public-inbox rpm package for RHEL or CentOS? > > FWIW, this particular overseer is is also pretty exhausted from the > effort of moving sourceware to a new system + new software and would not > relish the effort involved in getting all of this moved to new software. >
Honestly this is not about blaming you at all. I do not quite understand what is the exact software which was used previously? what is the exact problem that prevents it from being used any longer? Which software is being used now? Why is gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org. and fort...@gcc.gnu.org even this e-mail thread visible on marc.info: https://marc.info/?l=gcc&m=158512515107459&w=2 but not gdb-patches ? Could you add a link to https://marc.info/?l=gcc-patches https://marc.info/?l=gcc https://marc.info/?l=gcc-fortran note the unsystematic name gcc-fortran, the list is fort...@gcc.gnu.org There is no gcc-help on marc.info There is https://marc.info/?l=gcc but there is no gdb-patches what needs to be done to host those lists on marc.info as well? What needs to be done to host these lists on spinics for instance, or what else exists that can be used to search the messages? Bernd.
