On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 01:57:47PM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> > seems to be what they emit on x86_64. Now, wonder what they do on other
> > targets
>
> Other targets are not supported :P
>
> > , and how does it play with all the other options that add stuff
> > to the start of functions, e.g. -fcf-protection=full (where it needs to
> > really start with endbr64 instruction)
>
> Using the options one will get:
>
> _Z4savev: # @_Z4savev
> .cfi_startproc
> .long 846595819 # 0x327606eb
> .long .L__unnamed_2-_Z4savev
> # %bb.0:
> endbr64
>
> So endbr64 is placed after the RTTI record.
Which is wrong, this will then fail on CET hardware.
Jakub
