On Tue, 3 Dec 2019, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > Thanks. Do other people have comments on the list? > > > > I'm going to add one vendor tag that should be uncontroversial to the > > list. /tags/gcc-1766 is a misnamed Apple tag, and there is already a > > properly named copy with identical contents at /tags/apple/gcc-1766 so > > deleting /tags/gcc-1766 should be safe. > > > > I've looked through the list; I don't see anything that looks like it would be > especially controversial.
I've deleted /tags/gcc-1766 as a misnamed and duplicate tag. I'll plan to delete the other 640 tags later today in the absence of objections. (It's actually 640 not 645 because 5 tags appear twice in the list as having names matching both "merge" and "branchpoint".) -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
