On Tue, 3 Dec 2019, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > I can work on a script to do such rearrangements of tags and branches in > > the repository. My inclination is that such rearrangements of tag and > > branch names are probably done in a separate postprocessing script rather > > than as part of the conversion itself, especially if we're using custom > > namespaces not in refs/heads/ and refs/tags/ - this makes verifying the > > conversion simpler. (But deletions of tags and branches we don't want to > > convert at all are appropriate to do in SVN.) > > That would be great. It would probably also be faster than the reposurgeon > approach, and it would also work with the other candidate conversions we still > have on the table.
OK, I'm working on that (and have moving of vendor branches working). Eric, can Richard and I get direct write access to the gcc-conversion repository? Waiting for merge requests to be merged is getting in the way of fast iteration on incremental improvements to the conversion machinery, it should be possible to get multiple incremental improvements a day into the repository. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
