On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 11:31 AM Segher Boessenkool < seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:56:50AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote: > > Yep. I don't think we need to worry about getting optimal one-line > > summaries for ancient commits; something reasonably unique should be > plenty. > > In that case, how about just "SVN rNNNNNN"? And then we don't need the > footer from git-svn anymore either? And don't need to mangle or wrangle > the commit message itself at all either. > Well, I was thinking of also giving some clue of what the commit was about. One possibly cut-off line accomplishes that, a simple revision number not so much. Jason
