On 19/11/2019 16:31, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:56:50AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
Yep. I don't think we need to worry about getting optimal one-line
summaries for ancient commits; something reasonably unique should be plenty.
In that case, how about just "SVN rNNNNNN"? And then we don't need the
footer from git-svn anymore either? And don't need to mangle or wrangle
the commit message itself at all either.
Segher
Sorry, disagree. That's as bad as just the author name, IMO.
R.
