On 10/30/18 10:58 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 09:54, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 09:18, Rasmus Villemoes <r...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2018-10-30 09:29, Martin Liška wrote:
>>>> On 10/30/18 3:56 AM, Alexander Oblovatniy wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'd like to report a typo in description of
>>>>> «__builtin_expect_with_probability»:
>>>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html#Other-Builtins
>>>>>
>>>>> The description starts with "The built-in has same semantics as
>>>>> *__builtin_expect_with_probability*", but it seems like *__builtin_expect*
>>>>> should be there.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for reporting the issue. It's fixed as r265615.
>>>
>>> Other issues around the same place: "expected probability (in percent)"
>>> seems to contradict "valid values are in inclusive range 0.0f and 1.0f".
>>> The prototype is listed as
>>>
>>> (long exp, long c, long probability)
>>
>> The testcases added alongside the new built-in use float arguments,
>> but the actual definition of the built-in seems to use a long double.
>>
>> What does "user can provide expected probability (in percent) for
>> value of @var{exp}" mean? What is the probability of the value of exp?
>> Don't you mean the probability that exp==c?
>>
>> Also the grammar in the text needs several fixes.
> 
> Maybe something like:
> 
> --- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
> @@ -12025,12 +12025,12 @@ when testing pointer or floating-point values.
>  @end deftypefn
> 
>  @deftypefn {Built-in Function} long __builtin_expect_with_probability
> -(long @var{exp}, long @var{c}, long @var{probability})
> +(long @var{exp}, long @var{c}, long double @var{probability})

Hi.

Thanks for rewording!

I guess we should use:
s/long double/double

> 
> -The built-in has same semantics as @code{__builtin_expect},
> -but user can provide expected probability (in percent) for value of 
> @var{exp}.
> -Last argument @var{probability} is of float type and valid values
> -are in inclusive range 0.0f and 1.0f.
> +This function has the same semantics as @code{__builtin_expect},
> +but the caller provides the expected probability that @var{exp} == @var{c}.
> +The last argument, @var{probability}, is a floating point value in the
> +range 0.0 to 1.0, inclusive.
>  @end deftypefn

That's definitely much better, can you pleas install it?

Thanks,
Martin

> 
>  @deftypefn {Built-in Function} void __builtin_trap (void)
> 

Reply via email to