On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:11:00AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > In > > DEF_FUNCTION_TYPE_3 (BT_FN_LONG_LONG_LONG_DOUBLE, > BT_LONG, BT_LONG, BT_LONG, BT_DOUBLE) > > > doesn't the first LONG refer to the return type, so that the third > argument just has type double? Other than that, your suggested update
Yes. A long double argument would be BT_LONGDOUBLE or written as _LONGDOUBLE
in the name of the fn type.
Jakub
