On March 29, 2018 5:14:42 PM GMT+02:00, Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com> wrote: >> Are you suggesting we should not care about regressions with features >> that are not enabled by default or which are only exposed with >> "non-standard" flags? The current scheme on which bugs get P1/P2/P4+ >> assigned is quite simple... > >I'm only suggesting keeping them at P3, which is not "don't care" as >far as I >know but just the default priority. The criterion could be a flag that >is not >part of any -Ox switches and not enabled on any primary+secondary >platforms.
That's basically having primary / secondary / rest passes (or command line switches) which we would need to document as such. Let's discuss this at the Cauldron - I'm certainly not going to block the release over a selective scheduling bug... Richard.
