On 21.03.2018 13:31, Martin Liška wrote: > On 03/21/2018 11:17 AM, Andrey Belevantsev wrote: >> Hi Martin, >> >> On 21.03.2018 12:48, Martin Liška wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> I noticed there are quite many selective scheduling PRs: >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84872 >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84842 >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84659 >>> >>> and many others. >>> >>> I want to ask you if you plan to maintain the scheduling? >> >> Yes. The current status is that I have patches for 83530, 83962, 83913, >> 83480, 83972, 80463. I don't have patches for any of the 84* issues. >> I'm planning to submit the patches for the former set and to look at the >> later set next week. > > Nice! > > Maybe we can create a meta bug to track all sel. scheduling issue. > May I create it?
Yes, of course. I would be happy because I can easily lose track (I have some queries in Bugzilla about scheduling but I don't monitor whole gcc-bugs traffic). In fact, I wasn't aware of some PR from your list until your mail. Best, Andrey > >> >> I usually do most of the work by myself after internal discussions with >> Alexander and other colleagues here, and there might be delays when I get >> busy with unrelated stuff. However, if there's a pressing need, we have >> enough knowledgeable people to fix any sel-sched PR within a week or so. >> >>> Is it enabled by default for any target we support? >> >> Yes, ia64 at -O3. The testing we make usually is like follows: bootstrap >> and test on ia64, bootstrap with sel-sched enabled on x86-64, and make any >> new tests from PRs be run on x86-64, ia64, and ppc. This way I'm confident >> that it mostly works on that platforms. > > Great. > >> >>> Should we deprecate it for GCC 8? >> >> No, I don't think so. > > Works for me. > > Thanks for clarification. > Martin > >> >> Best, >> Andrey >> >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Martin >> >
