On 04/08/17 10:38, Claudiu Zissulescu wrote: > Maybe better is to use the updated CsIbe repo from github > https://github.com/szeged/csibe. I use it for ARC to track the code > size. >
Thanks for the link Claudiu. Personally I'll probably stick with the existing code as I now have size data for it stretching back about 10 years, but I'll have a look to see if it might be worth running both. R. > Cheers, > Claudiu > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Richard Earnshaw > <richard.earns...@foss.arm.com> wrote: >> On 03/08/17 13:11, Steven Bosscher wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Long ago, there was a code size regression tester for at least >>>> ARM. Is that still around? >>> >>> There used to be autotesters from CSiBE. Something still appears to >>> exist (http://www.csibe.org/old/) but the last time I tried to run the >>> benchmark, I couldn't get the suite to compile. That was some years >>> ago, perhaps the situation is better nowadays (http://www.csibe.org/ >>> without the old, suggests something's changed at some point...). >>> >>> As for "long ago", see also your own reply to >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-07/msg00111.html :-) >>> >>> Ciao! >>> Steven >>> >> >> CSiBE does still build (but you need -sdt=gnu98). I build it nightly. >> >> R.
