On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Michael Karcher <deb...@mkarcher.dialup.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 26.01.2016 21:47, Richard Biener wrote: >>>> So, hookize and change to >>>> >>>> if (outgoing && POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (func)))) >>>> ... >>>> else if (POINTER_TYPE_P (valtype)) >>>> ... >>>> else >>>> ... >>> Looks good and clean to me, but I expect my patch to have the same >>> effect. >> I would still prefer the more obvious approach of using the target hook >> transition. > I intended to express in my last email: Me too, and I will prepare a > patch with a target hook if there is consensus that this patch can be > accepted. I do not want the current patch committed as-is, I just posted > it to get the idea across and start discussion.
Yes, I think such patch would be accepted. Richard. > Regards, > Michael Karcher
