On 26.01.2016 21:47, Richard Biener wrote: >>> So, hookize and change to >>> >>> if (outgoing && POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (func)))) >>> ... >>> else if (POINTER_TYPE_P (valtype)) >>> ... >>> else >>> ... >> Looks good and clean to me, but I expect my patch to have the same >> effect. > I would still prefer the more obvious approach of using the target hook > transition. I intended to express in my last email: Me too, and I will prepare a patch with a target hook if there is consensus that this patch can be accepted. I do not want the current patch committed as-is, I just posted it to get the idea across and start discussion.
Regards, Michael Karcher
