On 12/01/2015 03:29 PM, David Wohlferd wrote:
On 11/30/2015 4:01 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> There is a way for people to be clear about what they want to clobber,
>> and that's to use extended asm. The way to clear up the ambiguity
is to
>> start deprecating basic asm, not to add to the confusion by changing
its
>> behavior after all these years.
>
> Well, I disagree. The warning is good, but so is the memory clobber.
> They're not exclusive.
As Richard Henderson put it: "I'd be perfectly happy to deprecate and
later completely remove basic asm within functions."
I understand Richard's position and while I think it has some merit, I
think it's probably taking things too far at this time.
Jeff
