On Tue, 1 Dec 2015, David Wohlferd wrote: > Saying it's dead in the docs is the first step to making it dead in the code. > This patch just implements an optional warning (unless #3,4 crank it up to a > default warning), but the intent is that eventually (v7? v8?) this turns into > a fatal error.
I am strongly skeptical of this whole direction. As I noted, the basic asm syntax is part of the standard C++ syntax. We should define it to do something sensible consistent with existing practice. (That does not exclude a non-default warning, not part of -Wall or -Wextra, for people who wish to avoid basic asm in functions.) -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
