On 04/03/2015 09:30 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM, xue yinsong <xyshh94...@hotmail.com> wrote:
So it’s better not to try to read the exact dump format.
Could we use a similar but more complete syntax instead?
Absolutely. The initial attempt for gimple fe was to use a tuple-based
syntax that is very easy to parse. But that was only chosen because it
simplifies parsing.
You first need to design a text representation for the IL that allows
conveying all the elements needed to instantiate the in-memory
representation of gimple.
Crazy idea, what about something that's modeled after LLVM's representation?
Jeff
