On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM, xue yinsong <xyshh94...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>So it’s better not to try to read the exact dump format. >Could we use a similar but more complete syntax instead? Absolutely. The initial attempt for gimple fe was to use a tuple-based syntax that is very easy to parse. But that was only chosen because it simplifies parsing. You first need to design a text representation for the IL that allows conveying all the elements needed to instantiate the in-memory representation of gimple. Diego.
