Eric Christopher <echri...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Matthew Fortune > <matthew.fort...@imgtec.com> wrote: > > Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> writes: > >> On 07/22/14 06:56, Richard Sandiford wrote: > >> > I'll need to step down as MIPS maintainer this weekend in order to > >> avoid > >> > a possible conflict of interest with a new job. SC: please could you > >> > appoint some new maintainers to take over? > >> We'll get the process started. > >> > >> Stepping down doesn't require you do do anything further than removing > >> yourself as the listed maintainer for the MIPS port > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > Although I've only worked with you for a relatively short time I'd like > > to thank you for all the help and guidance you have given. I'm sure the > > MIPS community owes much to your stewardship over the years and I'm > > certain that it has been appreciated. > > > > Jeff: > > > > Now that Richard has stood down as the MIPS maintainer can you > > advise on the process for getting patches approved? Should we cc > > any particular global maintainer or just post and allow someone to get > > to it when they can? > > > > You can technically cc me on it, I've not been able to do a lot of > work with gcc until recently, but I am now reading the list etc. Patch > review will take a bit longer than Richard, he's very hard to replace.
My apologies, I knew you were a named MIPS maintainer but didn't know you were able to work on the codebase again. > I'm also down with you and Catherine being nominated for > maintainership, you've both been doing a lot of work in the area and > it makes some sense. Thanks, Matthew
