On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Matthew Fortune <matthew.fort...@imgtec.com> wrote: > Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> writes: >> On 07/22/14 06:56, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> > I'll need to step down as MIPS maintainer this weekend in order to >> avoid >> > a possible conflict of interest with a new job. SC: please could you >> > appoint some new maintainers to take over? >> We'll get the process started. >> >> Stepping down doesn't require you do do anything further than removing >> yourself as the listed maintainer for the MIPS port > > Hi Richard, > > Although I've only worked with you for a relatively short time I'd like > to thank you for all the help and guidance you have given. I'm sure the > MIPS community owes much to your stewardship over the years and I'm > certain that it has been appreciated. > > Jeff: > > Now that Richard has stood down as the MIPS maintainer can you > advise on the process for getting patches approved? Should we cc > any particular global maintainer or just post and allow someone to get > to it when they can? >
You can technically cc me on it, I've not been able to do a lot of work with gcc until recently, but I am now reading the list etc. Patch review will take a bit longer than Richard, he's very hard to replace. I'm also down with you and Catherine being nominated for maintainership, you've both been doing a lot of work in the area and it makes some sense. -eric
