On 01/24/2014 12:12 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23 January 2014 22:56, Chris Lattner wrote:
Unrelated to this thread, it would be great for this web page to get updated. You may
find it to be "a better-supported point of view", but it is also comparing
against clang 3.2, which is from the end of 2012, and a lot has changed since then.
Like a lot has changed since the GCC 4.2 version used in
http://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html :-)
(I'm glad the page acknowledges it uses that version now, thanks to
whoever did that!)
Ask them about the Fortran performance.
Cray, Inc. doesn't have any problem to include gfortran with their
latest supercomputing offerings as one of the three supported compilers
(their own, Intel's, and GNU).
ECMWF [1] just bought one and is installing it.
:-)
[1]
http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2012/10/24/weather-journal-storm-could-make-next-week-a-mess/
--
Toon Moene - e-mail: t...@moene.org - phone: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
At home: http://moene.org/~toon/; weather: http://moene.org/~hirlam/
Progress of GNU Fortran: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortran#news
