gcc  

Messages by Date

• 2024/07/13 Question about enabling additional flags in Ofast Hanke Zhang via Gcc
• 2024/07/13 Re: Sourceware mitigating and preventing the next xz-backdoor Trenton Davison via Gcc
• 2024/07/13 Re: insn attributes: Support blocks of C-code? Richard Sandiford via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 gcc-13-20240712 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Dalbey, Keith via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Dalbey, Keith via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Dalbey, Keith via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Dalbey, Keith via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 Re: Nonbootstrap build with Apple clang broken in gm2 FX Coudert via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 Re: Nonbootstrap build with Apple clang broken in gm2 Gaius Mulley via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 GCC 11.5 Release Candidate available from gcc.gnu.org Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/07/12 Re: Apply function attributes (e.g., [[gnu::access()]]) to pointees too Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/11 Re: Help with vector cost model Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/07/11 Re: Help with vector cost model Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2024/07/11 Re: g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2024/07/11 g++12 broke my system of overloaded operator<< Dalbey, Keith via Gcc
• 2024/07/11 gcc-12-20240711 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/07/11 Re: Apply function attributes (e.g., [[gnu::access()]]) to pointees too Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/11 Re: Apply function attributes (e.g., [[gnu::access()]]) to pointees too David Brown via Gcc
• 2024/07/11 Nonbootstrap build with Apple clang broken in gm2 FX Coudert via Gcc
• 2024/07/11 Re: Apply function attributes (e.g., [[gnu::access()]]) to pointees too Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/11 Re: Help with vector cost model Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/07/11 Re: Help with vector cost model Richard Sandiford via Gcc
• 2024/07/11 insn attributes: Support blocks of C-code? Georg-Johann Lay
• 2024/07/11 GCC 14.1.1 Status Report (2024-07-11) Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2024/07/10 Help with vector cost model Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2024/07/10 gcc-11-20240710 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/07/10 CFP deadline for Toolchains Track @ LPC 2024 extended Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc
• 2024/07/09 Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/09 Sourceware Open Office, Friday 16:00 UTC Mark Wielaard
• 2024/07/09 n3294 - The restrict function attribute as a replacement of the restrict qualifier Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/09 RE: [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Daniel Plakosh
• 2024/07/09 Re: [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/09 Re: md: define_code_attr / define_mode_attr: Default value? Richard Sandiford via Gcc
• 2024/07/09 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/09 md: define_code_attr / define_mode_attr: Default value? Georg-Johann Lay
• 2024/07/09 How to implement Native TLS for a specific platform? Julian Waters via Gcc
• 2024/07/09 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Paul Eggert
• 2024/07/09 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/09 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/09 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/09 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2024/07/09 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/08 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/08 P Linda Becker via Gcc
• 2024/07/08 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2024/07/08 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/08 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/08 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/08 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2024/07/07 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/07/07 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/07 gcc-15-20240707 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/07/07 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Sandiford via Gcc
• 2024/07/07 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Paul Eggert
• 2024/07/07 RE: [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Daniel Plakosh
• 2024/07/07 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/07 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/07 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/07 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/07 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Paul Eggert
• 2024/07/07 Re: WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/06 WG14 paper for removing restrict from nptr in strtol(3) Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/06 gcc-14-20240706 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 [[gnu::null_terminated_string_arg(1)]] on strtol(1) (was: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like) functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 gcc-13-20240705 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Ben Boeckel via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Emanuele Torre via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 [WG14] Request for document number; strtol restrictness Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions LIU Hao via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Xi Ruoyao via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 [PATCH v1] Remove 'restrict' from 'nptr' in strtol(3)-like functions Alejandro Colomar via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 Re: GCC Download Issue Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/07/05 GCC Download Issue Dinesh M via Gcc
• 2024/07/04 gcc-12-20240704 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/07/04 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Sandiford via Gcc
• 2024/07/04 DW_TAG_compile_unit's references to .debug_line and .loc directive extension Fangrui Song
• 2024/07/04 Ccccc. C. C. Susan Difraia via Gcc
• 2024/07/04 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2024/07/04 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2024/07/03 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/07/03 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/07/03 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Gerald Pfeifer
• 2024/07/03 gcc-11-20240703 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/07/03 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/07/03 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Gerald Pfeifer
• 2024/07/03 Re: I have questions regarding the 4.3 codebase... Sid Maxwell via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: I have questions regarding the 4.3 codebase... Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Mark Wielaard
• 2024/07/02 gmplib.org Down Joel Sherrill via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: I have questions regarding the 4.3 codebase... Sid Maxwell via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Florian Weimer
• 2024/07/02 Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Re: Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] Jakub Jelinek via Gcc
• 2024/07/02 Bad interaction between gcc and glibc's handling of GNU <error.h> extension [GCC PR 115724] David Malcolm via Gcc
• 2024/07/01 Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
• 2024/06/30 gcc-15-20240630 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/30 unwanted communication Mark Wielaard
• 2024/06/30 FUCK YOU WG21 FOR THIS import std; BS THAT BREAKS MY LIBRARY. FUCK YOU FUCK YOU unlvsur unlvsur via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 gcc-14-20240629 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 Dry Ft Bob Lange
• 2024/06/29 Re: IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 IFNDR on UB? [was: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands] Matthias Kretz via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/29 gas or as generates large bins Houssem H1 via Gcc
• 2024/06/28 gcc-13-20240628 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/28 Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function Iain Sandoe
• 2024/06/28 Re: Please help Mohd Kashif via Gcc
• 2024/06/28 Please help MR DEEPAK via Gcc
• 2024/06/28 About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function Basile Starynkevitch
• 2024/06/27 Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
• 2024/06/27 gcc-12-20240627 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jason Merrill via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: consistent unspecified pointer comparison Martin Uecker via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
• 2024/06/27 consistent unspecified pointer comparison Jason Merrill via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 About the effect of "O0" on inlining into a function. Iain Sandoe
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
• 2024/06/27 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/06/26 gcc-11-20240626 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/26 Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Eric Botcazou via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
• 2024/06/25 Re: Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Jeff Law via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Straw poll on shifts with out of range operands Andrew Pinski via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Eric Botcazou via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Thomas Koenig via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
• 2024/06/25 Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Andrew Stubbs
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2024/06/25 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Andrew Stubbs
• 2024/06/24 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Arsen Arsenović via Gcc
• 2024/06/24 Re: [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
• 2024/06/24 [RFC] MAINTAINERS: require a BZ account field Sam James via Gcc
• 2024/06/24 Office Hours for the GNU Toolchain on 2024-06-27 at 11am EST5EDT. Carlos O'Donell via Gcc
• 2024/06/24 Re: gnatlink vs. -mthumb -march=armv7-a+simd -mfloat-abi=hard Sebastian Huber
• 2024/06/23 gcc-15-20240623 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc
• 2024/06/23 Re: gcc git locked out for hours second day in a row Mikael Morin via Gcc
• 2024/06/23 Re: gcc 12.4 release archive? Richard Biener via Gcc
• 2024/06/23 [no subject] Ernesto via Gcc
• 2024/06/22 gcc-14-20240622 is now available GCC Administrator via Gcc

• Earlier messages
• Later messages