On 23 January 2014 22:56, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Unrelated to this thread, it would be great for this web page to get updated. > You may find it to be "a better-supported point of view", but it is also > comparing against clang 3.2, which is from the end of 2012, and a lot has > changed since then.
Like a lot has changed since the GCC 4.2 version used in http://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html :-) (I'm glad the page acknowledges it uses that version now, thanks to whoever did that!)
