On 08/21/2013 04:49 PM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
Looking into profopt.exp, 'dg-do' is not an expected dg- command. Is
there something wrong with your environment that some other testcases
with 'dg-do' inside are accidentally included in your tree-prof.exp
testing? :p
Maybe I'm simply not getting the joke, but this is a very recent issue,
like 1-2 days old and definitely I didn't change anything in my
environment. Also, I said, just browse gcc-testresults, you don't have
to trust me. But again, maybe I'm missing something funny.
Paolo.
