On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:08:26PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: >> I do not care very much but I disagree. Having some files with .c >> suffix and some with .cc suffix would imply some sort of difference >> where there is going to be none. > > Yeah -- this sort of discrepancy I don't like either. In gcc/, we > have 362 .c files and 0 .cc files, so every new .cc file will step out > of line...
Any thing *new* steps out of line for someone. Putting C++ programs in .c file is out of line for most people, including the newcomers that people worry about. For many tools, including editors, .c is a C file, not a C++ file, so you don't get the benefit of working with a C++ program. > That might be pain for people who are used to do > 'grep foo gcc/*.c' and suchlike. > > Marek