On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Diego Novillo <dnovi...@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Marek Polacek <pola...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:08:26PM +0200, Martin Jambor wrote: >>> I do not care very much but I disagree. Having some files with .c >>> suffix and some with .cc suffix would imply some sort of difference >>> where there is going to be none. >> >> Yeah -- this sort of discrepancy I don't like either. In gcc/, we >> have 362 .c files and 0 .cc files, so every new .cc file will step out >> of line... That might be pain for people who are used to do >> 'grep foo gcc/*.c' and suchlike. > > Any issues with doing a mass rename then?
I didn't want to open of the can of worm where would find any reason to make this happen. There might be genuine concerns with people doing work on branches. -- Gaby
