On 13/02/13 17:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13 February 2013 16:32, Alec Teal <a.t...@warwick.ac.uk> wrote:
On 13/02/13 16:11, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13 February 2013 15:33, Alec Teal wrote:
A few questions, what is this stage 1? (link to documentation please, or
a
descriptive answer).
See http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html
for the choice of file extension, this is really a tiny thing, but I do
have
a reason for .cpp
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1545080/correct-c-code-file-extension-cc-vs-cpp
So I have done some research :P
Your reason is a question closed as unconstructive, where the top
answers say it doesn't matter? Why does that support .cpp?
How about using .cc because the existing C++ code in GCC already uses .cc
How about scrolling down? It is such a small issue there is no definitive
answer, the compiler doesn't care, but there is some debate on that page.
I read it. That's not debate, just ill-informed speculation ("cpp is
the recommended extension for C++ as far as I know"). We already have
C++ code in GCC, the runtime library uses .cc and the G++ testsuite
uses .C, adding .cpp as a third choice based on the opinions in that
page or your feeling of unease doesn't seem like a good idea to me.
Why not rename them to?
