On 12/15/2012 07:02 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I did test i386-rtems in the past few months but it had a build breakage and I
filed a PR. That issue was resolved but at that point about 1/4 of the rtems
targets failed to compile.
You likely are referring to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175
Yes, this bug is fixed, but a follow-up discussion[1] of this
as resulted into what I had called "the known and yet unresolved
soft-float/i386" issues earlier in this thread.
Ralf
[1] Start around
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55175#c9
Todate, I know there are at least 2 (possibly 3) bugs interacting, one
(possibly 2) in GCC and one in newlib, which render the i386/softfloat
multilib variant of i386-rtems GCC non-functional.
