I am on travel and answering from my phone so don't remember all the exact dates and PRs.
I did test i386-rtems in the past few months but it had a build breakage and I filed a PR. That issue was resolved but at that point about 1/4 of the rtems targets failed to compile. I filed PRs but didn't get back around to running the tests and reporting. When I get home, I will do a build/test run for *-rtems and generate PRs, etc. --joel Robert Dewar <[email protected]> wrote: >On 12/15/2012 12:42 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>> If you want a port to be live show that it is live by posting regular >>> testresults to gcc-testresults. >> Not all of this world is Linux nor backed by large teams at $$$$ >> companies :) We simply do not have the resources do to this. > >But that's the point. If you don't have the resources, you seem >to be expecting others to provide them, but at this stage I >really don't see a strong argument for investing such effort. >
