> Assuming that the new implementation will be available in time for 4.9, my > primary concern is that in the meanwhile running the libstdc++ testsuite will > be quite noticeably slower. Do you have some numbers? Just use the numbers I used the last two times I tried to explain why PCH was useful to Diego! http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/PCHHaters http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompilationSpeed The proposal to remove a useful feature before implementing a replacement was absurd on face value and I'm glad it's been taken off the table. Sheesh. -benjamin
- RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Diego Novillo
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Chris Lattner
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Diego Novillo
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Paolo Carlini
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Diego Novillo
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Andrew Pinski
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Eric Botcazou
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Diego Novillo
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Chris Lattner
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Xinliang David Li
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4... Chris Lattner
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4.8 Miles Bader
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH post 4... Chris Lattner
- Re: RFC - Remove support for PCH p... Xinliang David Li
- Re: RFC - Remove support for P... Chris Lattner