On 04/11/2012 07:26 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

> GCC's diagnostics have got a lot better recently.
> 
> The http://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html page compares clang's
> diagnostics to GCC 4.2, which was outdated long before that page was
> written.
> 
> It doesn't help GCC's cause when people keep repeating that outdated info :-)


Spelling out the obvious, IWBVN if someone from the gcc camp did a
similar comparison using a current gcc.  Is there such a page somewhere?

-- 
Pedro Alves

Reply via email to