On 04/11/2012 07:26 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > GCC's diagnostics have got a lot better recently. > > The http://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html page compares clang's > diagnostics to GCC 4.2, which was outdated long before that page was > written. > > It doesn't help GCC's cause when people keep repeating that outdated info :-)
Spelling out the obvious, IWBVN if someone from the gcc camp did a similar comparison using a current gcc. Is there such a page somewhere? -- Pedro Alves
