Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> writes: > The entries in parens are only covered indirectly and may or may not > warrant their own components. I'd argue that it would be helpful to > have libada and libgo components of their own (while libcpp would > probably be overkill), but of course that's ultimately up to the > respective maintainers.
I see no advantage to a separate libgo component. Bug reports won't know which component to use when filing a bug. The maintainers of the go/libgo components would be the same. > I'm undeciced what to do about libdecnumber (primarily/exclusively from > upstream), libiberty (shared with src), and libssp (probably too > small/too little activity to warrant its own component). libiberty should just be other. Ian
