> The entries in parens are only covered indirectly and may or may not > warrant their own components. I'd argue that it would be helpful to > have libada and libgo components of their own (while libcpp would > probably be overkill), but of course that's ultimately up to the > respective maintainers.
My gut feeling is that having a single ada component is sufficient and having ada+libada wouldn't buy us much. But if for e.g. consistency with other components people feel strongly that we should have a separate libada component, that would be fine with me. Arno
