On 30 October 2011 13:14, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Joe Buck wrote: >> No, the page now claims something that is incorrect. The C++0x draft >> is no longer evolving. C++11 is an official standard now. > > How about the patch below? It tries to reflect the release of > C++11. There definitely will be more adjustments, but this is > a first step addressing the issue Joe raised (and a bit more).
I've changed my local tree to update all the references to C++0x in the libstdc++ docs (except references to the -std=c++0x option) which I'll check in when I get a chance.
