On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 14:14 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > + <p>C++0x was the working name of a new ISO C++ standard, which then > + was released in 2011 as C++11 and introduces a host of new features > + into the standard C++ language and library. This project seeks to > implement new C++0x features in GCC and to make it one of the first > compilers to bring C++0x to C++ programmers.</p>
Since C++11 is now the official name, wouldn't it be better to use the new name instead of the old one after the initial historical introduction? :) Like... C++0x was the working name of a new ISO C++ standard, which was then released in 2011 as C++11 and introduces a host of new features into the standard C++ language and library. This project seeks to implement new C++11 features in GCC and to make it one of the first compilers to bring C++11 to C++ programmers. Cheers, Oleg
