On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Joe Buck wrote: > No, the page now claims something that is incorrect. The C++0x draft > is no longer evolving. C++11 is an official standard now.
How about the patch below? It tries to reflect the release of C++11. There definitely will be more adjustments, but this is a first step addressing the issue Joe raised (and a bit more). Okay? (I'll also be happy to make further changes.) Gerald Index: cxx0x.html =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/projects/cxx0x.html,v retrieving revision 1.50 diff -u -r1.50 cxx0x.html --- cxx0x.html 26 Oct 2011 19:48:57 -0000 1.50 +++ cxx0x.html 30 Oct 2011 13:11:47 -0000 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ <html> <head> - <title>C++0x Support in GCC</title> + <title>C++0x/C++11 Support in GCC</title> <style type="text/css"> /* <![CDATA[*/ tr.separator { background: #ffffcc} @@ -9,11 +9,11 @@ </head> <body> - <h1>C++0x Support in GCC</h1> + <h1>C++0x/C++11 Support in GCC</h1> - <p>C++0x is the working name of the next ISO C++ standard, due by - the end of this decade, which introduces a host of new features into - the standard C++ language and library. This project seeks to + <p>C++0x was the working name of a new ISO C++ standard, which then + was released in 2011 as C++11 and introduces a host of new features + into the standard C++ language and library. This project seeks to implement new C++0x features in GCC and to make it one of the first compilers to bring C++0x to C++ programmers.</p> @@ -27,10 +27,8 @@ add <code>-std=gnu++0x</code> to your <code>g++</code> command line.</p> - <p><b>Important</b>: because the ISO C++0x draft is still evolving, - GCC's support for C++0x is <b>experimental</b>. No attempt will be - made to maintain backward compatibility with implementations of - C++0x features that do not reflect the final C++0x standard.</p> + <p><strong>Important</strong>: GCC's support for C++11 is still + <strong>experimental</strong>.</p> <h2>C++0x Language Features</h2>