-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/04/11 20:57, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 04/04/11 16:20, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> My proposal would be: A patch may be reverted immediately by anyone >>>> with SVN write access if bootstrap is broken for more than 24 hours on >>>> any primary target. With proper notification to everyone involved, >>>> obviously. >>> >>> I agree. >>> >>> FWIW, I reported the breakage and identified the cause within 8 hours of >>> the initial checkin. >> A report 8 hrs after a checkin may fall outside working for some >> developers, so they won't see it until the next work day. Obviously the >> developer would be expected to address the problem ASAP, but let's not >> get out of hand on reverting patches. >> > > Patch was checked in at Fri Apr 1 17:46:17 2011. I reported the failure > at 2011-04-01 18:49:28 and identified the range of causes. It is too bad > to take 3 days to fix it. Note the checking was Friday evening, it's entirely possible that the offender has a life and didn't work over the weekend.
jeff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNmywCAAoJEBRtltQi2kC7fmMH/2aD3kNKhQ16PXTX3g3hrpCo JIpaTAbqB5/Pnx98q4/JqdgxJojORJcp/b+U8kzcdY2c7DisOzBMbz45eLSF7+b5 Dgy3TLnh9v2v5mfkd67SKSQTYO7YJEUO6LHBIp9VmW6brMIJCsBs9xiOhPi1D9iq 9UTCGKAjavCOnMT7So5HdzolqRIUZl4r7NlGtioQ5FZeMbmMxwJ9twGpL3yCTozJ UaaaFgnFjM2J2U2qAALgYJeWh4yBDeFvY+Bni0SvJlCrDi7RTUvPcMbO0Ec754Ho 0qprz7D5VckrW45N97OfAVUXRTG+ILubmh+l+l7UWFQLOzoI0mnvxX2XA8Cx8zM= =p5L1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
