On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote: > Or just don't use range-for, it's not essential (given the trouble > it's caused I'd quite happily have lived without it in C++0x!)
IMO, this goes beyond the syntactic sugar that the range-for provides. It is about specifying a unified 'range' concept. The range-for is just the first, highly visible, user of this implicit specification. -- Rodrigo
