2010-11-29 13:25 CST, Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> wrote: >well this code is not valid C++03 code to begin with.
I agree. I mean "existing gnu++" if you will.
2010-11-29 13:25 CST, Andrew Pinski <[email protected]> wrote: >well this code is not valid C++03 code to begin with.
I agree. I mean "existing gnu++" if you will.