>>>>> "Steven" == Steven Bosscher <stevenb....@gmail.com> writes:
Steven> The argument against disabling java as a default language always was Steven> that there should be at least one default language that requires Steven> non-call exceptions. I recall testing many patches without trouble if Steven> I did experimental builds with just C, C++, and Fortran, only to find Steven> lots of java test suite failures in a complete bootstrap+test cycle. Steven> So the second point is, IMVHO, not really true. Is it possible to convert all failures of this form into a C++ test case with -fnon-call-exceptions? If so then at least there is a way to add regression tests. Steven> Is it possible to build and test java without all of libjava? As far as I'm aware, not at present. I think even the minimal possible subset of libjava is pretty big, on the order of hundreds of classes, IIRC. Tom
