On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think you are again talking about user benefits. You don't see a > (user) benefit in gcc->llvm because you perhaps do not use the > features that LLVM has and GCC doesn't. But users of gcc->llvm surely > see a large benefit if people have spent so much effort working on it, > first as a patched gcc and now as a plugin.
And then replacing it. What's your point? Ciao! Steven
