On 8 June 2010 11:17, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8 June 2010 10:43, Paolo Bonzini <bonz...@gnu.org> wrote: >> On 06/08/2010 06:42 AM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 15:05 -0600, Jeff Law wrote: >>>> >>>> So perhaps the thing to do is somehow separate patches from regular >>>> contributors and irregular contributors. A relatively easy way to do >>>> this would be for a regular contributor to include a keyword in their >>>> message to gcc-patches to mark the thread as not needing 3rd party >>>> tracking/pings. >>> >>> It seems that perhaps you are suggesting a status in between reviewers& >>> W.A.A. contributors. >> >> I don't understand. WAA rights definitely allow you to shepherd and commit >> patches from people without svn access, even for patches you can't approve. > > And basile (and other WAA contributors), this would a nice > contribution. Asking people that do not appear to have access to svn > whether you want to commit their patches for them. And keeping them in
It should say: "whether they want you to commit their patches for them." Cheers, Manuel.
