On Apr 21, 2010, at 1:51 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: >>>> http://cx4a.org/software/gccsense/ >>> >>> This approach seems highly, uh, "inspired" from the exact same >>> functionality in Clang. Any reason not to contribute to that >>> effort? >> >> Surely trying to persuade people to contribute to some other project >> rather than gcc is off-topic here. Even if not, it's pretty hostile. > > Would such a feature be accepted in GCC? Otherwise, this seems like a > misunderstanding. Chris was not suggesting to contribute to Clang > instead of GCC but instead to contribute to the Clang completion > library rather than create your own 1-person project. Or at least this > is how I understood it.
I actually meant to respond to him personally, I apologize for cc'ing the list. I did this because the other responses made it seem that it wasn't something that would be accepted back into GCC proper. Maintaining an invasive patch on the side for a long period of time didn't seem like a great idea. -Chris
