On Apr 22, 2010, at 4:29 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> >> I did this because the other responses made it seem that it wasn't >> something that would be accepted back into GCC proper. Maintaining an > > Can you point at any response that said it would not be accepted back into > GCC proper? There were no such comments AFAIK. All that has been said > is that it is not possible to implement it AS A PLUGIN,
Nope, you are correct. Again, the cc was a mistake and I apologize for it. > at least not currently > and would probably require way too many hook points unless it wants to do > only code completion after . and -> (and not e.g. after :: and many other > tokens). For C++ tentative parsing is probably the biggest problem that > needs solving. I predict it won't be accepted into GCC mainline either, but we'll see. :) -Chris
