Frank Isamov <frank.isa...@gmail.com> writes: > 1. Is it possible to add a machine dependent reorg pass at backend > level without changing the standard infrastructure? If so, can you > please point me such example? If no, may the new plugin architecture > help here?
See TARGET_MACHINE_DEPENDENT_REORG. > 2. A peephole for such case just repeats instruction definition > pattern. As all information already available for such peephole, > wouldn’t it be useful to implement the pass to be a part of the > standard infrastructure? See define_peephole and define_peephole2. If that doesn't answer your question, can you rephrase it? Ian
